Joyce for idiots?

By Jason Diamond

A friend once told me that “only snobs, and English majors like Joyce”, and since said friend was herself an English major,  I figured it might be best to hold off reading anything by him until I was totally prepared.  To me, Joyce has always seemed like a hefty task to take on, and I feel like if I am ever going to truly make any judgments, I really need to be ready before I pick up Finnegans Wake or Ulysses.

So when Mark Batty Publishing recently published Everyman’s Joyce, I was semi-stoked, because I like to consider myself part of the “everyman” market who thinks of themselves as “Joyce-curious”, and would like a pretty decent primer.

Unfortunatly, this isn’t the primer I was looking for, but it’s a sweet looking book

Advertisement

5 Comments

Filed under Events

5 Responses to Joyce for idiots?

  1. Davin

    I always thought “Re Joyce” by Anthony Burgess was an entertaining and humorous approach to Joyce. As Burgess puts it “My book does not pretend to scholarship, only a desire to help the average reader who wants to know Joyce’s work but has been scared off by the professors.”

  2. Mike Wills

    I think you are best off avoiding Finnegans Wake, but Ulysses is worth the time.

  3. Pingback: the scowl » Blog Archive » Thoughts on “Collective Reading”

  4. Pingback: Bites: That guy from The Princess Bride, chapbook reviews, Grouper at ATP, intellectual bankruptcy, and more « Vol. 1 Brooklyn

  5. Pingback: Bites: Book Review Highlights, Kakutani Two-Step, Required Reading, the Millennials, and Why Our Media is Getting Scolded « Vol. 1 Brooklyn

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

Please log in to WordPress.com to post a comment to your blog.

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s